Monday, May 28, 2012

Has Romney Peaked Already?

One of the great things about being a Paulbot is that you suddenly find yourself surrounded by a lot of other people who are also paying attention.

By Roger F. Gay

The most closely guarded secret that Big Media can't keep is that odds are against Mitt Romney ever becoming president. Following a magic formula read by Laura Ingraham last month, Romney advanced against Obama in the polls briefly this month before dropping back again to a somewhat more stable losing position.

The “magic formula” was to pretend to be Ron Paul. There are of course, people out there who don't pay much attention, who can often be counted on to respond positively to such shenanigans. But this month's polling results seem to confirm the obvious. Who Mitt Romney really is, is too well known, too obvious; and he's nowhere near as good an actor as Ronald Reagan or as confident with a jail house con as Newt Gingrich. The magic trick worked like a magic trick. Romney supporters had just enough time to applaud before it all went up in smoke.

One gets the sense that Team Obama is just playing with the guy. In case you've forgotten, we were all admiring how well they had done after his win in 2008. He'd first come from behind to overtake Hillary and then made John McCain look like an amateur. McCain had his few days in the sun too, with the Sarah Palin convention bump. If you don't see a pattern to it, you need to find your thinking cap. Conservative is popular. Fake conservatives are not.

Obama is bad, mmkay! But in order to beat him in November the Republican Party needs a better candidate. How about the obvious? A real conservative.



10 comments:

  1. Ron Paul or nothing at all, in 2012!
    The politicians are all corrupted by Bank of Rothchild.
    If you really want to know shy we have so many problems read this. It really sheds some light on an intriguing problem. . .
    http://connect.freedomworks.org/node/202956/discussions/787738

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes. Even Bain donates to Obama, what the heck? If they were conservatives they'd be donating to Ron Paul.
    As a bundler Bain has donated well over a million. That doesn't count individual employee donations. opensecrets.org

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Romney's a Political Class child. His work at Bain was mostly as a lobbyist and he only had time for that due to losing elections. So much for experience in the private sector and being a champion of free market capitalism.

      Delete
  3. i have been saying this for 6 months and nobody seems to want to listen,,,the RNC does not care if it wins the white house...period,,,the RNC and DNC are concerned with one thing only,,,keeping Dr. Paul out of the oval office this election cycle,,,because people,,,this is the last free election cycle...and obullcrap will be god..just as chavez is in vens..this has been the goal for 100 years and now they are on the brink,,,Dr.Paul is the only thing in there way..and the sheeple keep right on keepin on saying this cant happen in the usa,,well,,it soon will be the ussa and we wont be able to do a thing about it civilly,,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Having a Republican majority in Congress and a Republican president would ruin their patent excuse: that they have to "compromise" to "get things done."

      Delete
    2. Anyone with half a brain will realize that the media is not honest and has been twisting the facts for years
      now. I'll go with my gut feeling as to what I know is best for our country rather than fall for the lies the media wants you to believe.

      Delete
    3. I have a question, Roger. What DO we do about the media when Paul gets nominated and beyond?

      Delete
    4. Personally, I think Big Media is making itself irrelevant. There is no more "news" on national / international TV networks; just Jerry Springer inspired chatter with less chair throwing. I'm pretty confident that most people reading my articles find them more credible than Bill O'Reilly or Chris Matthews.

      Ron Paul has polled consistently tied with or ahead of Barack Obama in match-ups even with the poor treatment from Big Media (while Mitt has a hard time looking like a contender with all the advantages). With the R nomination, I don't see Obama having much of an honest chance.

      The biggest concern in Paul verses Obama will be (once again) cheating on the ground. ACORN is still out there by different names and vast amounts of public money has already been pumped into their treasury. But you know Ron Paul's ground troops are extremely good. (And nobody cares enough about Romney to check a single card for a hanging chad.)

      Delete
    5. By the way, Roger, I must have become a Libertarian in these last few years; I find your articles very informative, insightful.

      Delete
    6. Thank you for your kind comment, K.Yount. I've never actually been a Libertarian. A libertarian maybe, but I tend to fight for the language. In traditional American, I'm basically a political conservative. Besides that, I'm really heart and soul, an analyst who's spent a lot of time analyzing policy and politics. From there, it's just a matter of honesty. It's the facts and logic thing. Libertarians seem to like it.

      Delete